Ioannis Grigoriadis and Esra Dilek (2018, p. 7), argue the fence disseminated ‘the message
that Greece is not an ‘open gate’ to Europe’; thus, it can no longer be considered a liability
for ‘fortress Europe’. The fence was constructed in 2012, amid great controversy over its
rationale and potential effects (Public Issue, 2011). In addition, given the irony behind
European Commission’s rejection of funding such a venture as ‘pointless’ and a ‘shortterm measure’, Greece bore the brunt of its erection during the economic crisis that had
plagued Greece since 2008 (European Parliament, 2012; Ekathimerini, 2012). The final
construction was 10.3 km long, consisting of two cement walls with barbed wire inbetween, and run along the north-eastern side of the Greek-Turkish borders, between the
villages of Kastanies and Nea Vyssa. It cost 3,16 million euros and was paid for by Greek
taxpayers (Angeli et al., 2014).
However, the fence would only secure a very small part of the 290km land border, leaving
the river border uncontrolled. According to police data, the rise of ‘illegal migration’ in the
area had acquired troubling proportions. The first six months of 2012, apprehensions in
Orestiada rose by 151,56%, compared to the same period in 2011 (Ministry of Citizen
Protection, 2012b). As a former police officer recalled his experience at the border ‘What
I noticed, and it’s tragic, has to be heard. I was going to the [border] station at 6 in the morning and by
7:30 we had plenty of immigrants knocking on the doors and surrendering themselves. They came on their
own; we didn’t have to go out on patrol…Just consider this. During an 8hour shift, we had not 5 or 10
people but 50 immigrants. If you add all the shifts in all police stations…there are 3 or 4 in every region’
(Interview, Petrou Ralli detention centre, 2011)
As the quote above implies, the numbers of new arrivals were so high that the focus could
not be just on deterring them with the construction of a fence but also on controlling all
irregular arrivals through the tightening of border controls; a realization that was shared
along the political spectrum. Yet they were not implemented solely in response to party
political ambitions. Partly subsidised by the European Union to the tune of 250 million
euros, the origins of the aforementioned plans appear to have come, as with much Greek
border control, from further north.
National Operation Aspida (shield), which involved the deployment of more border
officers, was launched in the summer of 2012 (Frontex, 2012). ‘The Greek Police have
played and continue to play an important part in the implementation of measures for the
control of the legality of entry of alien immigrants in Greek territory’, explained the
99
Επιλογή στοχευμένης παραγράφου3
Σύνδεση με παράγραφο
Σύνδεση με οντότητα
Απενεργοποίηση επισημάνσεων
Προσθήκη στον πίνακα περιεχομένων