- 21 - • His attestation, according to the Official Administrative Investigation, that violence was exercised against him by a policeman at the detention area of the airport, element that is declared false by his codefendant M. T., raise, undeniably, doubt, to every credulous judge of the complaint, about the time, the way that any of his wounds were caused, and most importantly about the perpetrator of those. This doubt is growing stronger, according to the person that conducted the Official Administrative Investigation, and becomes certitude, that no violence was exercised against the complainant, during his embarkation on the aircraft in order to be expelled, to the examined witnesses, C.P. and M.T., from which the things that emerge are: the followed procedure for the complainant’s embarkation on the aircraft on 20.2.2007, everything that took place and he did not get on board the aircraft, but also the fact of no exercise of violence against him by the escort policemen. Besides this, the foreigner’s general behavior during his transfer from the detention facilities of the Aliens Division of Attica to the airport, his short stay at the detention area of the airport, until his delivery by the spokesperson of the company, but also even after his negative reaction to his expulsion, from any evidence of the administrative investigation did not emerge, that it was of such kind, that it could have caused the policemen’s exercise of violence against them. The foreigner’s expulsion is an administrative action, in the expedition of which, the escort policemen participate and the non accomplishment of the expulsion did not give rise to any responsibility, which probably could cause their indignation and in “cold blood” could lead them to a violent reaction. In conclusion, and after the complainant’s attestation according to the administrative investigation is noticed, apart from those mentioned above, that during his detention no violence has been exercised by policemen, it is logical to wonder and of unidentifiable cause or result the choice of violence exercise by the policemen, at a public area, meaning the boarding area of the passengers to the aircraft (air gate), with only certain outcome to expose themselves in penal and disciplinary prosecution. (10) According to the person that conducted the Official Administrative Investigation: (a) The foreigner’s S.G. aforementioned complaints are not grounded. (b) No behavior which was disregarding towards him, because of his nationality or his beliefs, was ever displayed by escort policemen at any time during his transfer and the complainant’s expulsion procedure. (c) It does not appear, or even implied any reason-initiative, because of which the doctors of “LAIKO”, who examined the foreigner on 21.2.2007, omitted any finding of the examination, and by hiding this, to proceed on false affirmation of their opinions. (d) It is beyond any doubt, despite the doctors’ different estimation, that S.G. had on 23.2.2007 late phase and decomposition injuries, which, however, cannot be attributed to the escort policemen’s actions on 20.2.2007, according to the proofs of the administrative file of proceedings, due to the fact that evidently no violence was exercised by them against him, at no time, from his delivery at morning hours on 20.2.2007 in order to be expelled until his reimmurement to the detention facilities at the Aliens Division of Attica at evening hours on the same day. They could, however, be the outcome of his reaction against the embarkation effort to the aircraft, or even they could be provoked by any other no definable cause, way or means. Because of the above, no responsibility for neither the two Police Officers, or for any other policeman came up, the competent decisive body, that tried the case, put it in records, from disciplinary view.