geographers have also explored detention centres as part of what they call the border
assemblage (Pillant, 2017; Pillant and Tassin, 2016).
In addition, there is a considerable quantity of reports produced by NGOs and human
rights organisations (Amnesty International, 2010a; 2012a; CPT, 1994-2020; Global
Detention Project, 2020; 2021; Human Rights Watch, 2008; 2011; Medicins Sans
Frontieres, 2010; 2014, Pro Asyl, 2007; 2012). In lack of academic scrutiny, I have
extensively drawn on these reports, especially in the first chapters, where I address the
early years of detention, because they are rich in detailed descriptions of the conditions
inside immigration detention centres. In this way, they offer a glimpse into largely hidden
and forgotten infrastructures.
Unlike in other countries,15 there are very few journalistic accounts of the situation inside
the country’s detention facilities. Those which exist mostly cover riots from the inside,
thus reproducing an image of detainees as dangerous, or use information they have
gathered from secondary sources about human rights violations. As one journalist told me
‘There is no interest in detention. There is a small segment of the public that wants to learn about human
rights violations.’ (Interview, Athens, 2018). The same person, though, told me that he had
never made any attempts to enter a detention centre. In fact, the only way some of these
journalists have been able to access three sites of confinement is through covering visits
organised by the human rights committee of the left-wing party, Syriza, in the lead-up to
the 2015 elections. Media reports from Amygdaleza from that period contribute to what
Cetta Mainwaring and Stephanie Silverman (2017, p. 34) term as ‘detention as spectacle,’
which at the same time ‘makes visible and renders invisible, it perpetuates myths and
creates distance between people and reality, and between citizens and noncitizens.’
Notwithstanding the importance of exposing the situation inside detention centres, the
time-sensitive access these journalists had, and the conspicuous silence of the media before
and after that period created a short-lived political spectacle that was easily deflated.
What the limited academic scholarship and NGO and media reports share, though, is that
to a large extent they focus on border detention sites, entirely overlooking what happens
inside other facilities in the mainland. Notable exceptions are a collective brochure by
In the UK, for example, there has been a number of uncover documentary videos secretly filmed from
inside the centres. See Channel4, 2015a; 2015b and BBC Panorama, 2020. See also Silverman (2015).
15
24
Επιλογή στοχευμένης παραγράφου3
Σύνδεση με παράγραφο
Σύνδεση με οντότητα
Απενεργοποίηση επισημάνσεων
Προσθήκη στον πίνακα περιεχομένων