122
Europe and Central Asia
Summary of Amnesty International’s Concerns in the Region, January – June 2007
TKP)
were
attacked
by
unidentified
assailants in the Ereğli district of Zonguldak
in the Black Sea region of Turkey while
attempting to gather signatures for a
petition entitled “We are not afraid of the
USA”. The group fled after being stoned by
the group of attackers that reportedly
swelled to around 500 people. Police
prevented the lynching of one TKP
supporter and made eight arrests, the
majority being TKP supporters.
On 4 June two Kurdish seasonal workers in
Adapazarı in the Sakarya province of
Turkey were subjected to an apparently
racially motivated mob attack by unknown
assailants. At the time of writing no charges
had been brought in connection with the
attack.
AI was particularly concerned that in the
context of such attacks on 8 June the Chief
of General Staff issued a press release
containing the following statements: that
individuals and organizations that support
peace, freedom and democracy were being
“used as a screen for the terrorist
organization,” and that "the military call for
the Turkish nation to demonstrate a mass
reflective reaction to acts of terror.” In the
context of increasing attacks demonstrating
intolerance against members of the public
the intervention from the head of the
armed forces could be considered to be
inflammatory, provoking further violence.
Prosecutions limiting basic freedoms
/ Prisoners of Conscience
Those exercising their rights and basic
freedoms continued to be prosecuted under
unfair laws, with some such prosecutions
resulting in convictions.
In February AI urgently reiterated its
concerns in the case of eight men convicted
after an unfair trial solely on the basis of
their non-violent political beliefs (see
Turkey: Justice Delayed and Denied: The
persistence of protracted and unfair trials
for those charged under anti-terrorism
legislation (AI Index: EUR 44/013/2006)
and
UA
31/07:
Prisoners
of
Amnesty International
Conscience/Unfair Trial (AI Index: EUR
44/002/2007)). Evidence against them was
largely based on statements allegedly
extracted under torture. Following their
convictions, the men were at liberty
pending apprehension. By the end of the
period under review, at least four of them
had been imprisoned. AI considered them
to be prisoners of conscience.
On 13 April, 50 officers including from the
Anti-Terrorism Unit reportedly entered the
offices of weekly magazine Nokta in the
Bakırköy district of Istanbul, with a search
warrant issued by the Bakırköy public
prosecutor upon a complaint filed by the
military prosecutor in the office of the Chief
of the General Staff. Nokta had published
an article about the relationship between
certain unnamed civil society groups and
the military on 5 April, seemingly arousing
suspicion that Nokta staff or associates had
gained access to confidential military
information. Nokta believed the raid was a
violation of the right to freedom of
expression. AI was concerned that the raid
may represent a pattern of increased
military intervention against those who
legitimately express views deemed to be
unacceptable
(see
AI
Index:
EUR
44/005/2007). Subsequently, cases were
brought against the journalist, Ahmet Şık,
and defence expert, Lale Sarıibrahimoğlu,
based on Article 301 of the Turkish Penal
Code.
Human rights groups were subjected to
additional scrutiny and made the subject of
attacks which represented threats to
freedom of expression and association. In
January AI Turkey’s bank accounts were
frozen and on 30 May a decision of illegal
fundraising was issued by the local
authorities from the district of Beyoğlu,
Istanbul. AI wrote to the national
authorities expressing concerns that the
freezing of AI Turkey’s bank accounts may
amount to a tactic of harassment intended
to impede its legitimate fundraising
activities (see AI Index: EUR 44/010/2007).
AI Index: EUR 01/010/2007
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents