253395
Testimony- Testimony collected by
- Border Violence Monitoring Network
- Date and location recorded
- 17 February 2025, Thessaloniki, Northern Greece
- Detention centre related
- Detention Centre Country
- Greece 2
- Duration of detention
- Less than 1 month
- Gender
- Female
- Type of arrest
- Individual
- Why was the respondent detained?
- Illegal entry
- Did the respondent experience any violence?
- Yes
- Type of violence experienced
- Threats and intimidation
- Was the respondent forced to sign documents?
- Yes
- Did the respondent have access to translation?
- No
- Did the respondent have access to medical aid?
- Yes, but insufficient
- Did the respondent have access to NGOs?
- Yes, upon request
- Did the respondent have access to legal support?
- No
- Did the respondent apply for asylum?
- Yes
- Number detained in cell
- 8
- Hygiene rating
- Very poor
- Type of cell
- Isobox/container, shared
- Had access to phone?
- Yes, own
- Ventilation
- Window
- Meal quality
- Very poor
- Meal quantity
- 2 per day, in PRDC
- Had access to outdoor space?
- Yes, limited space
- Had access to bed?
- Yes
- Had access to mattress?
- Yes
- Narrative
The respondent is an African woman who reported being apprehended with her teenage son at the Athens airport on charges of illegal entry. Upon arrest, the respondent was handcuffed by what she described as three male officers who were wearing black clothes. After that, the respondent reported being taken to a six-bed cell located within the Athens International Airport special holding facility. Reportedly, the respondent and her son stayed for four days at the airport holding facility, prior to being transferred to the Amygdaleza Pre-Removal Detention Centre (Amygdaleza PRDC). The respondent reported that her phone was confiscated during her detention at the holding facility, and returned upon transfer to Amygdaleza PRDC. She further reported that she was allowed access to her phone for limited periods of time at the airport holding facility, for instance to call family members. The respondent was not provided with an explanation for why her phone was confiscated.
During the detention at the airport, the respondent reported that communication with the authorities was difficult and she was not offered a translator or access to a lawyer. During this detention period, the respondent and her son were reportedly forced to sign documents written in a language that they could not understand. “Sometimes when you say, please, “I can't even read this”. They say “you can seek for someone there to explain for you”. So, it's very difficult for me”. [...] “Because they were giving me papers that were written in Arabic. I can't even read them”. The respondent’s son was reportedly also forced to sign documents despite not being able to understand their contents. The respondent added: “he didn't sign in front of me. He was called outside the room and told “come and sign here, sign here, sign here””.
After four days, the respondent and her son were transferred to the Amygdaleza PRDC where the respondent reported degrading living conditions. She specifically reported a lack of hot water and low quality of food provided to detainees, as well as poor hygiene in accommodation containers and outdoor areas within the detention facility. Reportedly, there was grass everywhere outside of the containers, the respondent was not given cleaning products and “even outside, there was no one who was cleaning the camp”. Detainees were provided with shampoo, toothbrush, toothpaste, and bath soap. The respondent reported living in an enclosed area within the detention facility specifically for women and families. The respondent reported that although there was a doctor present at the PRDC, they were not able to provide her with the treatment she needed.