- 32 c.
material conditions
59.
The special holding facilities for aliens in Mytilini, Peplos, Venna were converted (agro-)
industrial warehouses/complexes which, with some refurbishment, have been turned into detention
facilities. The Chios Temporary Reception Centre for irregular immigrants consisted of ten
furnished containers and was located half-way up a hill, overlooking the straits towards Turkey.
60.
Peplos consisted of three large dormitories with an official capacity of 70; at the time of the
visit it accommodated 128 detainees. Mytilini had an official capacity of 200 and was holding 11217
detainees in four large concrete hangars (men) and two dormitories (women) – the women’s
dormitories were out of sight and hearing of the custodial staff and there were no call bells. Both
centres were extremely dirty and in a squalid state of repair18. The delegation found dysfunctional
or no heating systems, an absence of warm water and broken windows. Further, both facilities had
defective sanitary and shower arrangements; in Peplos this meant that the 128 detainees had to
make use of a single functioning shower.
In Peplos detainees were forced to sleep on the floor as no beds were available, and for a
significant number of detainees there were not even mattresses; due to the cramped conditions,
some of the detainees were forced to sleep next to the leaking shower and toilet facilities. The
detainees spent most of the day locked up and access to the small outside yard was rarely provided.
In both Mytilini and Peplos the blankets and the mattresses were decrepit and bug-infested,
and should be replaced immediately. Moreover, the detainees were locked in their living areas most
of the day, apparently receiving less than an hour of outdoor exercise every day.
61.
At the time of the visit Venna was accommodating 92 irregular migrants for an official capacity
of 400 and, in general, the material conditions were slightly better as the site was better maintained. The
six dormitories for men had access to a sizeable outside yard, but access was rarely provided and
detainees were often locked up for days with no outdoor exercise. The dormitory reserved for women
had a private yard, fenced off from the men’s section, but it was only opened when female guards were
on duty. Also, in an attempt to economise on costs no warm water was available.
62.
Each container at the Chios centre was subdivided into three small rooms, a shower and a
toilet; one of the containers was reserved for women. At the time of the visit the centre held 127
detainees for a capacity of 120. During the day detainees had free access outdoors and at night only
the women’s unit was locked. In general the hygienic conditions appeared satisfactory. However,
many complaints were heard about the quality and quantity of the food, and the water supply was
irregular which meant that, at times, there was no drinking water.
17
18
The delegation noted from the register that on 1 January 2005 the centre was holding 588 foreigners, which
rose to 602 in the middle of the month and stood at 437 on 31 January 2005.
With the exception of the women’s dormitories in Mytilini, which were in a good state of repair.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents