2006. Compounding matters, in 2010 Greece was globally the country with the fourth
highest number of backlogged asylum cases, 48,201 (UNHCR, 2010a). As she contends,
the country’s exclusionary and sluggish qualities of the Greek asylum system, are not just
a matter of the sheer volume of cases but also a symptom of Greece’s bureaucracy and
unwillingness to address claims of protection seriously. In practical terms, those who were
unable to secure a red card, which certified that their asylum application had been received
and was being examined, could be detained again; therefore, connecting the streets outside
the Petrou Ralli offices, where migrants waited to be registered, to the detention centre
that was waiting those who failed to do so, two floors above.
The boundaries of deterrence
A development, which has influenced the location and the types of immigration detention
facilities, was the ‘transfer’ of migration routes from Western Greece to the Eastern
Aegean.47 The highest number of apprehensions at Greece’s borders during the period
under examination in this chapter was recorded in 2008, with 146,337 people being
arrested in a 12-month period, exceeding by 30% the previous year’s arrests. ‘It is the
anxiety that I feel every night when they release all the slave ships at the coasts of Greece,
without any control from Turkey, all these people that we have to take care of with respect
to their rights and their life’, said the Minister of Interior, Prokopis Pavlopoulos addressing
the Greek Parliament in June 2008 (cited in Düvell et al., 2010). However, contrary to the
official narrative, most apprehensions in 2008, 54,245, were, in fact, recorded in the
mainland, while only 30,149 were apprehended at the Greek-Turkish sea border and
another 14,461 at the Greek-Turkish land border; raising questions about the claims of
hordes of people coming from the East.
Yet, the moral panic about the rising numbers crossing from Turkey to the Greek islands,
paved the way for Greece to step up efforts to control the country’s borders, inviting the
involvement of European institutions. In 2006, Frontex, the European Border and Coast
Guard Agency, began operating in the Aegean using various operational means (agents,
equipment, etc.), aimed at stopping the massive arrival and entry of migrants. From 2008,
Arrests at the Greek-Albanian border did not cease during this period. In fact, between 2007 and 2010
they accounted for 30 per cent of total apprehensions (Triandafyllidou and Ambrosini, 2011). The difference
between Albanians and Middle Eastern migrants, which were the predominant ethnic group arriving through
the Greek-Turkish borders, however, was that the former were by that time easily deportable due to the
Readmission Agreement signed between the two countries in 2005; thus they did not represent a ‘deportation
problem’ anymore.
47
79
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents