Water –ever cold and non-drinkable– was only available for a couple of hours per day.98 As a result, beneficiaries were provided with daily rations of bottled water, as a means to counterbalance this gap. Each, however, was only entitled to a 1.5 liters bottle, which was evidently inadequate to cover their needs, let alone the needs of more vulnerable asylum seekers, whose conditions (e.g. diabetes) necessitate a constant source of hydration. Food was provided. Food ratios, however, were inadequate to cover beneficiaries’ basic needs, as despite the surge in arrivals since the summer of 2017, food quantities had reportedly remained the same, thus not reflecting increased needs.99 In terms of materials scarcity, the same was the case with winter clothing, with many beneficiaries wearing worn-out jackets and shoes (if they had any), and at times summer sandals, despite it being winter. Other crucial gaps we were informed of, regarded powder milk for newborns and babies, as well as sanitary napkins for women. While, lastly, and amongst many others, a final and highly concerning gap concerned the facility’s supervision. The RIC is in principle divided into an external and an internal section.100 The first, which was accessible through the RIC’s main gates, was the designated accommodation section for the vast majority of beneficiaries, which, however, due to over-congestion also housed (in tents and containers) a significant number of families with children, which were running all around. Despite this, however, no security checks were actually conducted at either of the RIC’s main gates, and anyone could freely enter and exit without officials taking notice of their presence.101 The situation was slightly better in the RIC’s internal section, where personnel offices, an area for the initial detention of newcomers, and 3 different wings for the accommodation of the most vulnerable (families, single women, UAM) were found. Notwithstanding the fact that said wings had security checks during the day, however, there have been frequent reports on the unavailability of adequate night patrols and dimly lit areas, 102 with some reporting a lack of security personnel after 16:00-17:00 at the UAM and single women sections.103 If true, this meant that said sections, which were open from 12:00-00:00, were largely left unguarded even during their open time. Within this context, the ever degrading living conditions of Moria, coupled with peoples’ de facto restriction within and around its premises, have consistently created a state of insecurity, adversely affecting the most vulnerable. “There is an environment of tension in Moria…there are people who cannot sleep for even one night…they live in a constant insecurity…day-by-day they become sicker��physically, mentally…”104 Drug selling, riots, interethnic, and interpersonal fights have become commonplace, with one such fight occurring in broad daylight, during our second visit (15th of December 2017). The fight was amongst two women, one of which, a pregnant minor whom, as per the employees that sped to resolve the fight, had some unknown suitor within the RIC. Whether, in her case, the pregnancy was the result of willing consent, was something we could not verify. This, however, further highlights the constant SGBV risk to which women are exposed within the RIC, not least due to the de facto unavailability 33