Europe and Central Asia
Summary of Amnesty International’s Concerns in the Region, January-June 2007
PACE resolution on the situation of
women in the South Caucasus
On 16 March the Standing Committee of
the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) adopted on behalf of the
Assembly Resolution 1544 (2007) and
Recommendation 1790 (2007) on “the
situation of women in the South Caucasus”.
The Resolution contained a call by PACE on
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia to take
part in the Council of Europe campaign to
combat violence against women, including
domestic violence. It also urged the
authorities of these countries to “raise
awareness among all relevant authorities
and the public at large about the existence
of violence against women, in particular
domestic violence”; to “take effective
measures to combat such violence by
adopting legislation, if they have not
already done so, including on marital rape,
and by establishing penalties in line with
the seriousness of the offences committed
and providing compensation for victims,
including by setting up a compensation
fund”; and to “set up shelters for victims
when there is no other way of protecting
them against the perpetrators”.
BELARUS
International concern about human
rights in Belarus
In a resolution on the “State of Human
Rights and Democracy in Europe”, adopted
on 18 April, the Parliamentary Assembly of
the Council of Europe identified Belarus as
“a country of particular concern where
democratic principles and the rule of law
had not yet been implemented”. On 17 May,
UN Member States did not vote in favour of
the candidacy of Belarus for the UN Human
Rights Council. General Assembly resolution
60/251, establishing the Human Rights
Council, stipulates that when electing
members of the Council, Member States
"shall take into account the contribution of
candidates to the promotion and protection
of human rights and their voluntary pledges
and commitments".
Amnesty International
19
Freedom of Expression
The authorities continued to harass
opposition activists by detaining them and
charging
them
under
both
the
Administrative and Criminal Codes in
violation of their rights to freedom of
expression
and
assembly.
Opposition
activists
were
targeted
during
the
preparations for the Freedom Day march on
25 March. The date is the anniversary of
the creation of the Belarusian People's
Republic in 1918, and is not recognized by
the government, but is celebrated as a
symbol of national pride by opposition
members. Prominent opposition activists,
Vintsuk Vyachorka, and
Vyachaslau
Siuchyk, alleged that they were detained
and charged under the Administrative Code
to
hamper
their
activities.
Vintsuk
Vyachorka was arrested on March 13 at the
entrance to his home and charged with
using obscene language. Police initially
detained Vyacheslav Siuchyk for his
likeness to a known criminal and then
charged him with urinating on the street.
Both politicians denied these charges. At
separate trials on 4 April both were found
guilty of petty hooliganism, but the judge
did not impose a fine or detention because
the offences were so “insignificant”.
According to local human rights activists
police used fists and batons against the
demonstrators on 25 March in an effort to
stop them gathering on October Square in
the centre of the capital city of Minsk.
Some 50 to 60 demonstrators were
reportedly detained, and subsequently
sentenced by a court to up to 15 days’
administrative detention.
On 3 April, Andrei Klimov, an opposition
leader, was arrested and accused of “calling
for the overthrow or the change of the
constitutional order with the aid of the
mass media.” He had published a number
of articles on the internet calling for
peaceful change of government. In July, he
remained in detention awaiting trial, and
facing a potential prison sentence of two
years.
On 26 April, after the traditional “Chernobyl
Way” march in commemoration of the
AI Index: EUR 01/010/2007
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents