56
9. Asylum and the asylum procedure in detention
■
In Greece, recognition rates for all nationalities
remained far below EU averages until the beginning
of 2011. According to official statements, the recognition
rate, including all statuses (asylum, subsidiary and humanitarian), rose to 12,35 % (in the first half of 2011). On the
surface this percentage might suggest that there has been
an impressive increase in the recognition rate. A deeper
analysis, however, reveals that this rate relates more to
the backlog in open asylum cases. In these pending cases
(backlog) there are people with a certain profile coming
from countries such as Iraq (Iraqi Christians), Iranians,
Afghans etc. who are in need of international protection,
and who have been waiting several years for their interviews.
In the area of Evros, the systematic prolonged detention
upon arrest, especially under the conditions mentioned
above, functions as a deterrent measure against lodging
asylum applications and as a barrier to gaining access to a
fair asylum procedure.
During our missions and until October 2011, the competent
authorities in charge of examining applications for international protection in Orestiada, Evros (P.D. of Orestiada
the SSub/Directorate of Orestiada), have granted only one
subsidiary status to a detainee. No asylum or humanitarian
statuses were granted to detainees.
9.1. Access to asylum and risk
of refoulement
The police, with very a few exceptions, issue a deportation order to nearly all apprehended persons. No claim for
international protection is registered upon arrest. The
persons in need of international protection are detained
pending deportation. This practice constitutes a direct
denial of international protection and exposes them to a
serious danger of refoulement.
In detention, the access to asylum is restricted. The majority
of the detainees wishing to seek international protection
cannot have access to the asylum procedure. Their asylum
179 See also: Chapter 9.4.
180 See also: Chapter 4.2.2.
claims are either not registered at all by the authorities
or only after days or months of delay. While the support
from a lawyer or NGO seems to be necessary even for the
delayed registration of the asylum application, access is
not guaranteed even in these cases.
We have heard reports about cases where the police have
deliberately misled asylum seekers.179 The latter signed
either solemn declarations that they do not want to apply
for asylum or a confirmation that they would withdraw
from the asylum application. There are other cases where
detainees were falsely led to believe that their applications
had been registered by the police, but instead of being
protected they were deported.
There are also cases where the lawyers had informed the
police of detainees who wished to apply for asylum, but the
police either registered them months later, thus putting
them in danger of expulsion, or never registered them at all
and deported them.180 We observed a discrepancy between the numbers of persons who requested asylum (for
whom GCR-lawyers had send faxes for their access to the
asylum procedure), and the numbers of officially registered
asylum claims during the same period. Thus, it seems as
though even the detainees who informed GCR-lawyers
about their wish to claim asylum had not secured access to
the asylum procedure.181
It is clear that the appalling detention conditions, the
prolonged detention duration for asylum seekers, the lack
of legal safeguards and the lack of reception conditions
prevent the majority of detainees from applying for international protection in detention. It was shocking to meet
persons with a well-founded fear of persecution who were
so desperate that they would prefer being deported than
staying even one more day under the abysmal detention
conditions.
Owing to the lack of proper legal information and interpreters, many have been ill-advised by police officers or
private lawyers, and did not apply for asylum, hoping to be
released soon.
181 During the first half of 2011, 16.000 were persons were
arrested in Evros for illegal entry while only 224 asylum claims
have been registered in the area (158 in Alexandroupolis
headquarters and 66 in Orestiada) in the same period.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents