- 20 - (8) On the report of their written explanations, the Police Offices that transferred S.G. and M.T. on 20.2.2007 to the El. Venizelos airport, in order for the latter to be expelled, they mention among other: “…after we had arrived to the airport, we led them to the detention area of passport control…where M.T. told us that he did not want to leave and we did not move to the checking procedure… S.G. did not express a negative stance and so we called the spokesperson of the air-line company GULF AIR, C.P., in order to take a look at him and talk with him…The spokesperson came, talked with him, he did not bring any objection and we moved on to the procedure… We walked towards the air gate for embarkation on the aircraft with the spokesperson… In the air gate he fell down and told that he did not want to leave…he walked with the spokesperson and just before the aircraft entrance he fell down again and hit his head…The spokesperson denied to take him…his expulsion was annulled, we took him, bringing him back to the detention houses, with the Tunisian one, and we gave them to the Officer on duty. The above described by the policemen, have been confirmed by all attestations (Official Administrative Investigation) by the examined witnesses, in which incidents are differently described by S.G.’s complaints. (9) With regard to S.G.’s medical examination on 23.2.2007 and the findings, which are written down to the medical notice of the General Hospital Of Nikaia-Piraeus “Agios Padeleimon” on 23.2.2007, according to the undersigned and responsible for the examination doctor, in the course of the Official Administrative Investigation, P.I.: (a) From their nature, multiplicity and physical features they befit an assault. (b) They could have been evident, accordingly to the period of time between the incident and the first examination. (c) The foreigner’s S.G. declaration on 21.2.2007 to a European Committee, that on 20.2.2007, during the embarkation procedure on the aircraft in order to be expelled, violence has been exercised against him by policemen, findings of which (violence) the doctors they examined him on 21.2.2007, were never discovered, in combination with: • His declaration to the doctors that examined him on 23.2.2007, that violence had been exercised against him five days ago, an inconsistency, which himself attributes to a mistaken translation of the interpreter (although he cannot explain how the same person translated differently the same things in these two cases). • The doctor’s P.I. opinion, that: “the findings could have been evident, accordingly to the period of time between the incident and the first examination”.

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents