24
THE DUBLIN II TRAP
TRANSFERS OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS TO GREECE
According to Greek law, a person applying for asylum can make a declaration to the police,
when they submit their asylum application, that they are homeless (PD 220/2007 Article 6).
Indeed, this declaration of homelessness is a necessary step, without which the Ministry of
Interior (and since October 2009, the Ministry of Citizens’ Protection) will not notify the
Ministry of Health to seek accommodation for the asylum-seeker.83 In practice the police do
not always inform asylum-seekers of their right, if homeless, to be enrolled in the relevant list
of the Ministry of Health so as to be provided with accommodation and do not automatically
accept such declarations.
Without an address registered on the asylum application card, the pink card will not be
renewed after six months and the applicant will not be in possession of a document which
legally entitles him or her to stay in the country. This results in a risk of the asylum-seeker
being arrested, detained and even deported. Six of the Dublin II returnees interviewed by
Amnesty International had experienced problems renewing their pink cards. Some had tried
to renew their card in Patras in 2008 but the police would not renew their card since they
were homeless and living in a camp, and could not provide a permanent address.84
Although, in law, homelessness should not be a barrier to renewal of the card, in practice the
police generally refuse to register individuals as “homeless”. In the few cases where they
have registered homeless asylum-seekers, they usually have only done so after the
intervention of a third party, such as an NGO.85
M., an asylum-seeker from Iran, who was transferred from Belgium at the end of 2008, was not allowed to
register on his card the address of the hotel where he was staying because he was not renting an apartment.
The fact that he was staying at a hotel was considered insufficient. The police finally permitted him to register
his address as the name of the hotel after Amnesty International intervened.
The homelessness of Dublin II returnees has wider implications. According to UNHCR,
Dublin II returnees who could not provide an address upon arrival in Greece and who were
notified by the Greek authorities on the status of their asylum application through the
“Notification of Persons of Unknown Residence Procedure”, were particularly
disadvantaged.86 The absence of an effective notification mechanism resulted in returnees
not being able to follow up the outcome of their asylum applications, and risked missing the
deadline to lodge their appeal according to the requirements of the former system (PD
90/2008).
Under the new system (PD 81/2009), Dublin II returnees are asked not only to report their
address but also to provide a rental contract or official notice from the person who rents the
flat where they are living. They receive their pink cards from the Asylum Department at
Petrou Ralli, but the asylum application cards will not be supplied unless they can produce
this evidence of their address. This condition constitutes yet another barrier to access to the
asylum procedure.
A six-member Iraqi family, returned to Greece from the Netherlands in late 2009, was not given accommodation
by the state. In order to be provided with pink cards, the family was asked by the Asylum Department not only to
provide the police with its address but also to submit a rental contract. The family, who had no financial
resources, was provided with accommodation through other Iraqi asylum-seekers who paid their rent, and they
were finally issued with pink cards. Due to the hardship of the situation in which they found themselves, the
Amnesty International March 2010
Index: EUR 25/001/2010
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents